CEENELS 2017 Conference (Kraków)

CEENELS 2017 conference “An Uneasy Legacy: Remnants of Socialist Legal and Political Thinking in Central and Eastern Europe”, Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, 7-8 January 2017 – report by Wojciech Zomerski.

On 7-8 January 2017 the Jagiellonian University Faculty of Law and Administration hosted the CEENELS 2017 conference convened by Mgr. Piotr Eckhardt (Jagiellonian University), Dr. Jacek Malczewski (Jagiellonian University), Dr. Michał Paździora (CLEST, University of Wrocław), Mgr. Michał Stambulski (CLEST, University of Wrocław). The conference was hosted by the Department of History of Political and Legal Thought, Jagiellonian University in collaboration with the Centre of Legal Education and Social Theory (CLEST), University of Wrocław. The topic of this year’s CEENELS conference was “An Uneasy Legacy: Remnants of Socialist Legal and Political Thinking in Central and Eastern Europe”. The organizers intended to study the “uneasy legacy” of the socialist period both in legal and political culture in our region and especially invited contributions in the form of case studies regarding the on-going impact of actually existing socialism/communism in different countries of the region.

The conference gathered almost forty scholars from seven CEE countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Poland). On 7th January, the conference was opened by a keynote debate devoted to “Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe – Between the Socialist Heritage and Illiberal Tendencies” moderated by adv. Michał Stambulski. Prof. Dr. hab. Tomasz Pietrzykowski (University of Silesia in Katowice), Prof. Dr. Mátyás Bencze (University of Debrecen) and Dr. Lucian Bojin (University of Timișoara) discussed the condition of rule of law in Central Eastern Europe in the light of recent developments as well as historical legacies of actually existing socialism. The debate was followed by four parallel sessions, comprising a total of eight panels (with two-four presentations in each panel). Specific panels addressed issues of legal education, social memory, transitional justice, the condition of self-government, democracy and the rule of law, as well as examples of legal survivals (remnants) of the period of actually existing socialism in contemporary legal systems of the CEE countries.

On the second day of the Conference there were two parallel panels consisting with a total of five presentations. The issues discussed included restrictions on personal liberties in Poland in a historical perspective, adjudication in CEE, civilian awards and family allotments as examples of legal survivals of actually existing socialism, Andrzej Leder’s notion of the dreamed-through revolution, the issue of communication in law, the crime of defamation and law and memory issues. The Conference was closed by the final plenary session. Professor Martin Škop (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic) delivered a paper devoted to “Lack of Discussion and Twilight of Legal Science”. Professor Škop discussed legal science as limited and strongly influenced by the socialistic heritage, where open discussion and mutual criticism is rather suppressed in favor of false collegiality. In his paper he traced the reasons and context of this situation and exposed possible and covert mechanisms influencing the current shape of legal science in the Czech Republic. Dr. Cosmin Sebastian Cercel (Nottingham University) discussed the issue of “Socialist Law as Interregnum: On War, (Dis)Continuity and the End of State-Truth”. The author discussed what socialism meant either as a matter of jurisprudential inquiry or as a matter of legal ideology. Dr. Cercel focused in his paper on the Romanian context, following constitutional and criminal law developments related to the communist takeover. Doc. Dr. Jānis Pleps (University of Latvia) delivered a paper entitled “The socialistic heritage in the constitutional interpretation: case of Latvia”. The author analyzed constitutional cases from times of democratic transformations to show strong socialistic flavour of legal interpretation in Latvian jurisprudence which has remained despite the restoration of independence.

The Conference was followed by concluding remarks of the organizers. They thanked all gathered scholars for coming to Kraków and already invited to the 3rd Annual Conference which will be hosted by the University of Latvia, Riga. Adv. Stambulski expressed his special gratitude to Mgr. Eckhardt whose effort and dedication made the conference a true success.

Wojciech Zomerski